Lib Dems oppose "Damaging" County Council budget

8.00.00am GMT Fri 12th Feb 2010

"We supported limiting the Council Tax rise to 2.5%, but opposed the content of the Tories' budget, as it does the opposite of what residents want."

The Liberal Democrats on Surrey County Council have voted against the Tory administration's budget for 2010/11 at County Hall. County Cllr Colin Taylor said: "We supported limiting the Council Tax increase to 2.5% as proposed. Many Surrey residents are struggling to pay their bills during the economic downturn, so the Council Tax needs to be set as low as possible whilst allowing for adequate funding for services. However we opposed the contents of the Conservatives' budget, as it does the opposite of what Surrey residents want."

He continued: "The Conservative budget cuts services that Surrey residents regard as vitally important. The services set to be reduced include road maintenance, bus services, the youth service and social care services for children and adults. These cuts are simply unacceptable."

"Surrey residents expect the poor condition of the roads to be improved, not be allowed to deteriorate. Many people have already protested about the planned cuts to public bus services and school bus services, because lots of residents rely on them and because buses help to reduce traffic congestion on Surrey's roads."

"The cuts to the youth service will mean fewer activities for young people, when Surrey residents have been asking for more activities to be provided."

"The Budget also includes reductions in respite care for families of children with disabilities to support them in their caring role. This is a backward step as more not less respite care is desperately needed."

"The Budget also proposes increasing charges for services to disabled people when they are often on low incomes and can least afford to pay. It is wrong to place these additional costs on disabled people."

Colin concluded: "All in all, this budget cuts important front line services and yet it does not go far enough to reduce the bureaucracy and to make the County Council efficient. The cuts should fall on administration and back office functions, to protect vital services that Surrey residents need."